Marginal Effects for Probit and Tobit with Endogeneity

06/26/2023
by   Kirill S. Evdokimov, et al.
0

When evaluating partial effects, it is important to distinguish between structural endogeneity and measurement errors. In contrast to linear models, these two sources of endogeneity affect partial effects differently in nonlinear models. We study this issue focusing on the Instrumental Variable (IV) Probit and Tobit models. We show that even when a valid IV is available, failing to differentiate between the two types of endogeneity can lead to either under- or over-estimation of the partial effects. We develop simple estimators of the bounds on the partial effects and provide easy to implement confidence intervals that correctly account for both types of endogeneity. We illustrate the methods in a Monte Carlo simulation and an empirical application.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
05/03/2021

Identification and Estimation of Average Marginal Effects in Fixed Effects Logit Models

This article considers average marginal effects (AME) in a panel data fi...
research
03/17/2018

Consistent estimation of treatment effects under endogeneous heteroskedasticity

The empirical literature on program evaluation limits its scope almost e...
research
03/17/2018

Consistent estimation of treatment effects under heterogeneous heteroskedasticity

The empirical literature on program evaluation limits its scope almost e...
research
06/10/2021

Confidence in Causal Discovery with Linear Causal Models

Structural causal models postulate noisy functional relations among a se...
research
10/08/2018

Multiply robust two-sample instrumental variable estimation

Although instrumental variable (IV) methods are widely used to estimate ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset