Logics for modelling collective attitudes

11/10/2017
by   Daniele Porello, et al.
0

We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional attitudes that are defined by means of the majority rule. It is well known that majoritarian aggregation is subject to irrationality, as the results in social choice theory and judgment aggregation show. The proposed logics for modelling collective attitudes are based on a substructural propositional logic that allows for circumventing inconsistent outcomes. Individual and collective propositional attitudes, such as beliefs, desires, obligations, are then modelled by means of minimal modalities to ensure a number of basic principles. In this way, a viable consistent modelling of collective attitudes is obtained.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/17/2023

On decidable extensions of Propositional Dynamic Logic with Converse

We describe a family of decidable propositional dynamic logics, where at...
research
11/10/2017

Judgment aggregation in non-classical logics

This work contributes to the theory of judgment aggregation by discussin...
research
10/16/2019

Algebraic Semantics for Propositional Awareness Logics

This paper puts forth a class of algebraic structures, relativized Boole...
research
10/12/2011

Combining Spatial and Temporal Logics: Expressiveness vs. Complexity

In this paper, we construct and investigate a hierarchy of spatio-tempor...
research
11/06/2021

A Presheaf Semantics for Quantified Temporal Logics

Temporal logics stands for a widely adopted family of formalisms for the...
research
03/20/2018

Collective Schedules: Scheduling Meets Computational Social Choice

When scheduling public works or events in a shared facility one needs to...
research
07/11/2023

Aggregating Credences into Beliefs: Agenda Conditions for Impossibility Results

Binarizing belief aggregation addresses how to rationally aggregate indi...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset