Judgment aggregation in non-classical logics

11/10/2017
by   Daniele Porello, et al.
0

This work contributes to the theory of judgment aggregation by discussing a number of significant non-classical logics. After adapting the standard framework of judgment aggregation to cope with non-classical logics, we discuss in particular results for the case of Intuitionistic Logic, the Lambek calculus, Linear Logic and Relevant Logics. The motivation for studying judgment aggregation in non-classical logics is that they offer a number of modelling choices to represent agents' reasoning in aggregation problems. By studying judgment aggregation in logics that are weaker than classical logic, we investigate whether some well-known impossibility results, that were tailored for classical logic, still apply to those weak systems.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/13/2022

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Non-Classical Logics. Theory and Applications

Non-Classical Logics. Theory and Applications (NCL) is an international ...
research
07/22/2019

Aggregating Probabilistic Judgments

In this paper we explore the application of methods for classical judgme...
research
11/10/2017

Logics for modelling collective attitudes

We introduce a number of logics to reason about collective propositional...
research
06/09/2021

Choice Logics and Their Computational Properties

Qualitative Choice Logic (QCL) and Conjunctive Choice Logic (CCL) are fo...
research
04/14/2022

Another Combination of Classical and Intuitionistic Conditionals

On the one hand, classical logic is an extremely successful theory, even...
research
04/14/2022

Dunn Semantics for Contra-Classical Logics

In this paper I show, with a rich and systematized diet of examples, tha...
research
04/06/2022

Adversarial Learning to Reason in an Arbitrary Logic

Existing approaches to learning to prove theorems focus on particular lo...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset