Journal ranking should depend on the level of aggregation

04/08/2019
by   László Csató, et al.
0

Journal ranking, that is, placing journals within their respective fields, is an important research evaluation tool. Several indices have been suggested for this purpose, typically on the basis of citation graph. We follow an axiomatic approach and find an impossibility theorem: any self-consistent ranking method, which satisfies a natural monotonicity property, should depend on the level of aggregation. Our result presents a trade-off between two axiomatic properties and reveals a dilemma of aggregation.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
06/09/2020

The utilization of paper-level classification system on the evaluation of journal impact

CAS Journal Ranking, a ranking system of journals based on the bibliomet...
research
06/29/2021

Disturbance of questionable publishing to academia

Questionable publications have been accused of "greedy" practices; howev...
research
05/31/2022

Weight Set Decomposition for Weighted Rank Aggregation: An interpretable and visual decision support tool

The problem of interpreting or aggregating multiple rankings is common t...
research
09/25/2019

Understanding the Twitter Usage of Science Citation Index (SCI) Journals

This paper investigates the Twitter interaction patterns of journals fro...
research
01/15/2020

Unbiased evaluation of ranking metrics reveals consistent performance in science and technology citation data

Despite the increasing use of citation-based metrics for research evalua...
research
03/13/2018

Model Visualization in understanding rapid growth of a journal in an emerging area

A recent independent study resulted in a ranking system which ranked Ast...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset