Is human scoring the best criteria for summary evaluation?

12/29/2020

∙

by   Oleg Vasilyev, et al.

∙

0

∙

share

Normally, summary quality measures are compared with quality scores produced by human annotators. A higher correlation with human scores is considered to be a fair indicator of a better measure. We discuss observations that cast doubt on this view. We attempt to show a possibility of an alternative indicator. Given a family of measures, we explore a criterion of selecting the best measure not relying on correlations with human scores. Our observations for the BLANC family of measures suggest that the criterion is universal across very different styles of summaries.