Interpreting a Penalty as the Influence of a Bayesian Prior

02/01/2020

∙

by   Pierre Wolinski, et al.

∙

0

∙

share

In machine learning, it is common to optimize the parameters of a probabilistic model, modulated by a somewhat ad hoc regularization term that penalizes some values of the parameters. Regularization terms appear naturally in Variational Inference (VI), a tractable way to approximate Bayesian posteriors: the loss to optimize contains a Kullback–Leibler divergence term between the approximate posterior and a Bayesian prior. We fully characterize which regularizers can arise this way, and provide a systematic way to compute the corresponding prior. This viewpoint also provides a prediction for useful values of the regularization factor in neural networks. We apply this framework to regularizers such as L1 or group-Lasso.