Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges

12/20/2018
by   Giovanni Abramo, et al.
0

The evaluation of performance at the individual level is of fundamental importance in informing management decisions. The literature provides various indicators and types of measures, however a problem that is still unresolved and little addressed is how to compare the performance of researchers working in different fields (apples to oranges). In this work we propose a solution, testing various scaling factors for the distributions of research productivity in 174 scientific fields. The analysis is based on the observation of scientific production by all Italian university researchers active in the hard sciences over the period 2004-2008, as indexed by the Web of Science. The most effective scaling factor is the average of the productivity distribution of researchers with productivity above zero.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/05/2018

Testing the trade-off between productivity and quality in research activities

In recent years there has been an increasingly pressing need for the eva...
research
04/03/2018

Is science driven by principal investigators?

In this paper we consider the question what is the scientific and career...
research
11/05/2018

Research productivity: are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones?

This work analyses the links between individual research performance and...
research
10/30/2018

A multivariate stochastic model to assess research performance

There is a worldwide trend towards application of bibliometric research ...
research
11/05/2018

A robust benchmark for the h- and g-indexes

The use Hirsch's h-index as a joint proxy of the impact and productivity...
research
12/20/2018

Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers' productivity

Bibliometric indicators are increasingly used in support of decisions fo...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset