I Introduction
The explosive increase of mobile data services and the use of smart phones require the 5G network to support higher spectrum efficiency (SE), higher energy efficiency (EE), and higher mobility. The currently employed modulation techniques based on multiinputmultioutput orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (MIMOOFDM), unfortunately, are not sufficient in satisfying such 5G requirements. Conventional MIMO may achieve high SE with massive antennas, but has compromised EE due to the scaled power consumption of a large number of RF chains. The OFDM modulation is prone to Dopplerinduced intercarrier interference (ICI). Its inherent high peaktoaverage power ratio (PAPR) also necessitates expensive power amplifiers. Novel advanced modulation techniques are therefore very much needed. To this end, the recently emerging index modulation (IM) techniques arise as a promising candidate that has the potential to meet the 5G requirements[1].
IM refers to a family of modulation techniques that rely on the activation states of some resources/building blocks for information embedding. The resources/building blocks can be either physical, e.g., antenna, subcarrier, time slot, and frequency carrier, or virtual, e.g., virtual parallel channels, signal constellation, spacetime matrix, and antenna activation order. A distinct feature of IM is that part of the information is implicitly embedded into the transmitted signal. Consequently, a much smaller number of RF chains is required for a massive MIMO configuration via the random selection of transmit antennas according to the information bits. This sotermed spatial modulated (SM)MIMO [2] has been proved to strike a favorable tradeoff between SE and EE. One may also deactivate some subcarriers and use the activation states of subcarriers to convey additional information. The resultant index modulated (IM)OFDM technique [3] improves the SE and EE while alleviating PAPR and facilitating easier ICI mitigation thanks to empty subcarriers.
The basic concept and recent development of SMMIMO and IMOFDM were presented in [1]. Different from the approach therein, we aim to establish a unifying framework for general IM techniques, and provide indepth discussions on the SE and EE issues. Note that both SMMIMO and IMOFDM end up using less medium resources relative to traditional MIMOOFDM, in that only a subset of transmit antennas or frequency subcarriers are activated. Nevertheless, they tend to achieve more EE and SE that are urged by 5G. It is then a curious question that whether IM can naturally do more with less. To address this intriguing question, in this article, we make an endeavor to investigate the general notion of IM which subsumes SMMIMO and IMOFDM as representative special cases. We systematically establish a general framework unifying space, time, and frequency , in which IM can be applied individually, combinatorially, and jointly. We then put existing forms of IM into this general framework in order to facilitate systematic delineation of their pros and cons. From these, we aspire to shed light on whether IM can really do more with less.
We then move on to discuss possibilities of enhancing IM performance via, e.g., inphase/quadrature IM, precoded IM, and diversityenhancing IM. The objective is to reveal how these techniques can ultimately help IM to further improve the SE and EE.
All discussions in this article will be intimately coupled with core 5G application scenarios involving massive MIMO, full duplex, cooperative communications, and high mobility. Together with a unifying perspective for existing works in this field, future directions that can potentially fill blanks in this general framework will also be presented.
Ii The IM Family
Existing IM schemes are mainly carried out in space, time, and frequency slots, or the combination of them, among which the most marked similarity lies in the utilization of the active radio resources to carry information. Generally speaking, IM splits the information bits into index bits and constellation bits. The former determine which portion of the radio resources (antennas, subcarriers etc.) is active, and the latter are mapped to conventional constellation symbols that are to be carried by the active resources. Suppose that out of the resource indices are active. The system SE in terms of bps/Hz is:
(1) 
where denotes the binomial coefficient, and is the cardinality of the symbol constellation. Fig. 1 demonstrates the index mapping of existing IM schemes in different domains, which will be discussed next.
Iia IM in Space
SM is a representative IM technique in the space domain. As illustrated in Fig. 1 (a), it works with a single RF chain and conveys information via the antenna index [2]. The SM signal constellation consists of : 1) the conventional quadrature amplitude modulation constellation; and 2) the antenna index constellation. Conveying information via the active antenna index, SM enjoys spatial multiplexing gain with a singleRF chain transmitter. Hence, SM is more energy efficient and its detection complexity is lower than vertical Bell Labs layered spacetime (VBLAST) systems. One drawback of SM is that the information conveyed by the antenna index increases in , where is the transmit antenna number. When is large, SM suffers from compromised SE. The idea of SM can also accommodate multiple active transmit antennas to improve SE, giving rise to generalized SM (GSM). However, it requires multiple RF chains and induces interchannel interference.
IiB IM in the SpaceTime
Transmitting signals across multiple time slots facilitate transmit diversity in MIMO systems. Previous focus was on spacetime matrix designs that strike the largest coding and diversity gains with satisfactory receiver complexity. Recently, interests shift towards the exploration of the spacetime resource to convey information. Differential SM (DSM), an IM technique in the spacetime domain, is a representative example [4]. The index mapping of DSM is shown in Fig. 1
(b), which determines the current antenna activation order according to that in the former spacetime block and the current index bits. As a differential solution to SM, DSM avoids the challenging channel estimation inherent to SM. Research revealed that DSM results in no more than 3dB performance loss compared with SM
[4].Like SM, DSM operates with a single RF chain, but bypasses the accurate estimation of the channel state information (CSI) that is computationally demanding.
IiC IM in Frequency
IMOFDM is a representative IM technique in the frequency domain, which extends the SM principle to OFDM subcarriers [3]. In IMOFDM, not all subcarriers carry information symbols, and the indices of inactive subcarriers convey information via IM , as illustrated in Fig. 1 (c).
To date, several work have demonstrated that IMOFDM can outperform plain OFDM in terms of the bit error rate (BER) under the same SE. It is revealed in [3] that: 1) IMOFDM achieves the maximum rate if and only if the subcarriers within each group experience independent fading via e.g., interleaved grouping; 2) IMOFDM with interleaved grouping can achieve an up to 3 dB signaltonoise (SNR) gain over plain OFDM for small (typically ), though this improvement becomes smaller and even diminishes as grows; 3) The advantage of IMOFDM over plain OFDM can be maximized by choosing a specific number of inactive subcarriers (typically 1, or 2), and is more noticeable under PSK input.
IiD IM in SpaceFrequency
MIMOOFDM has already been widely accepted as one fundamental technique in current wireless communication systems. To incorporate IM into MIMOOFDM, one straightforward way is to carry out conventional modulation in one domain (space or frequency/subcarrier), and superimpose IM in the other domain. For example, using all subcarriers, while implementing independent SM per subcarrier leads to SMOFDM; whereas using all antennas but implementing independent subcarrier activation per each antenna would result in MIMOOFDM with IM (MIMOOFDMIM)[5]. However, these architectures entail high detection complexity. Lowcomplexity decoder design remains an open problem.
Recently, generalized spacefrequency IM (GSFIM)[6] was proposed. Instead of treating space and frequency domains independently, the active elements are jointly selected. In GSFIM, a group of transmit antennas are activated by the information bits and the active spacefrequency elements are then jointly selected according to the remaining information bits. Therefore, it is the generalization of SMOFDM and MIMOOFDMIM. The index mapping of SMOFDM, MIMOOFDMIM, and GSFIM are shown in Fig. 2 (a)(c).
To fully exploit the benefit of IM in MIMOOFDM, comparison of existing schemes is important. However, to date, such study is still missing. In Fig. 3, we show the bit error rate (BER) performance of MIMOOFDMIM, GSFIM, and SMOFDM with 4 transmit antennas and practical minimum mean square error (MMSE) detector at 4 bps/Hz and 8 bps/Hz over i.i.d. frequency selective Rayleigh channels, with perfect CSI. Since MIMOOFDMIM and SMOFDM are special cases of GSFIM, all antennas are active in GSFIM, so that IM in space, frequency or the combination of them can all be tested. At low data rate, SMOFDM has the best performance at low SNR and MIMOOFDMIM performs the best at high SNR. Although all IM schemes perform worse at low SNR due to the erroneous detection of the indices, they demonstrate better error performance than VBLAST MIMOOFDM at mediumtohigh SNR. At 8 bps/Hz, SMOFDM becomes the worst . However, when the frequency selectivity is not significant, MIMOOFDMIM and GSFIM might suffer from performance degradation. Hence, SMOFDM is more robust at lower data rate and modest frequency selectivity, MIMOOFDMIM and GSFIM are more favorable at higher data rates and more severe frequency selectivity.
IM activates a subset of antennas and/or subcarriers and uses the subset indices and/or activation order as part of the signal modulation. In this sense, IM is engaging less medium resource, in contrast with conventional schemes when all antennas and subcarriers are activated all the time. Nevertheless, striving for improved EE and SE with less medium engagement, IM awaits not only optimized design in spacefrequency domains, but also thorough investigation in the exploitation of timedomain.
Iii Evaluation of the SE and EE
In this section, we investigate the SE and EE issues in IM systems. To evaluate the EE, we derive the coding gain of the IM schemes,
, which can be obtained by evaluating the high SNR approximation of the theoretical average bit error probability,
(2) 
where denotes the SNR, and is the coding gain. Note that in practice, the system energy consumption should also account for computational complexity and circuit/component power efficiency. Since the transmitter side RF chains contribute the largest portion to the system power consumption, if the schemes have similar hardware costs, e.g., the same number of RF chains, and also similar computational complexity, the EE is solely determined by the coding gain, which determines the uncoded error performance, and indicates the target RF transmit power to guarantee reliable transmission.
Iiia SE and EE in MIMO with IM
In MIMO systems, the conventional VBLAST is considered as the benchmark because it shares the same diversity order and similar decoding/encoding complexity with GSM with the same number of RF chains and maximum likelihood (ML) detection.
Fig. 4 (a) shows the coding gain vs. SE achieved by VBLAST and GSM with 4 receive antennas and PSK in i.i.d. Rayleigh environments. The coding gain is calculated with respect to the SIMO system with 32PSK modulation using the union bound. The GSM system with transmit antennas, transmitter RF chains and PSK is referred to as . Three scenarios with are considered.

With fixed number of transmitter RF chains, GSM can flexibly adjust the system SE by varying both the transmit antenna number and the modulation order, while VBLAST can only change the modulation order.

By increasing transmit antenna number without increasing RF chains, GSM benefits from moderate coding gain degradation, e.g., higher EE, as SE increases.

GSM reduces the required RF chain number while achieving similar coding gain and SE.
IiiB SE and EE in OFDM with IM
Similar to GSM, in IMOFDM systems, the SE improvement over OFDM can be attributed to the additional index bits mapped to the subcarrier activation patterns. However, the increase of EE is obtained differently. This is because IM in frequency cannot reduce the required RF chain number, and the EE gain solely results from coding gain.
In Fig. 4 (b), the coding gain of OFDM/IMOFDM with respect to OFDM with 16PSK is plotted as a function of the achievable SE. The IMOFDM system with active subcarriers out of subcarriers per group is denoted by . The channel is assumed to be frequency selective Rayleigh. The conclusions are summarized below.

The coding gain provided by IM is proportional to the ratio of inactive subcarriers and index bits.

For a fixed modulation order, IM improves the SE and the coding gain simultaneously in comparison with plain OFDM. But both gains degrade as the modulation order increases due to the decrease of the share of index bits among all information bits.

When considering the realistic frequency selectivity of the channel, for approximate SE and coding gain, smaller group size is more preferable to realize the theoretical performance.
From all these, we can see that IM in both space and frequency domains can provide EE and SE gains that are primarily facilitated by the index bits. In conclusion, from the perspective of achievable SE and RF transmit power, IM indeed achieves higher SE and EE while using less RF chains and activating less space and frequency resources.
Iv Enhancements of IM
Based on the fundamental concept of IM in the space, time, and frequency, various papers aim at the improvement of the SE/EE, the potential of transmit diversity, precoding and other enhancements of current IM techniques. Due to the similarity among different IM techniques, the enhancements proposed for a specific scheme are usually applicable to all IM techniques. In this section, we introduce some recently proposed enhancements tailored for IM in order to meet the demanding needs of 5G. To better illustrate these, in Fig. 5, we present three typical enhancements designed for SM, which can be readily generalized to other IM schemes.
Iva InPhase/Quadratue IM
The RF signals usually contain the inphase component and the quadrature component. The orthogonality between them can be exploited to improve the SE of IM techniques. For example, given a symbol drawn from the PSK/QAM constellation [7], one may map its real part with a cosine carrier into a randomly selected antenna and its imaginary part with a sine carrier to another randomly selected antenna. This technique, termed as quadrature SM (QSM)[8] (Fig. 5 (a)), retains the requirement of a single RF chain while allowing more spatial bits to be transmitted. The frequency domain counterpart of OFDM with inphase/quadrature IM (OFDMIQIM), is shown to have significantly better error performance than IMOFDM at the same SE [9].
IvB Precoded IM
IM is not limited to a transmitter design. With transmitterside CSI, effective precoding techniques, such as zeroforcing and MMSE precoders, can facilitate parallel interferencefree channels at the receive antennas. Therefore, IM techniques can be transplanted to the receiver side. By selecting the active receive antenna indices, precoding aided SM (PSM) [10] can be formulated as illustrated in Fig. 5 (b). Different from SM/GSM, the detection of the constellation symbols at different antennas can be performed in a parallel manner, therefore significantly reducing the receiver complexity especially when multiple antennas are activated. Also, in order to bypass channel estimation in PSM, DSM can also be applied at the receiver side, which also induces 3dB performance penalty.
IM in the spacefrequency domain can also be applied at the receiver via precoding. With precoding, the received signals at different receive antennas are free of interchannel interference. As a result, the joint selection of the active elements in space and frequency domains will not increase the detection complexity as at the transmitter side, which will allow more flexible grouping across the space and frequency domain to reduce the intragroup channel correlation, and consequently improve the error performance.
IvC DiversityEnhancing IM
Beside the SE improvement and the receiver complexity reduction, research have been dedicated to the error performance enhancement of IM. Among these, diversityenhancing IM schemes are attracting increasing interests. Since IM are naturally applicable to multiple resources (antennas/subcarriers), some wellknown spacetime block codes (STBC), such as Alamouti, can be integrated by carefully designing the mapping of index bits. An example can be found in [11]. This STBCSM scheme is shown in Fig. 5 (c). Such designs are usually migratable among different IM schemes given similar channel properties. Specifically, the coordinate interleaving method proposed for IMOFDM [12] is also applicable to all precoded IM schemes, because with precoding, the received signal among the receive antennas becomes interferencefree.
IvD Discussions and Remarks
Scheme  RF chain number  SE  TX/RX complexity  Diversity order  CSIT/CSIR  Key advantage  
SM  Low  Low/Low  No/Yes  High EE  
DSM  Low  Low/Low  No/No 


GSM  Medium  Medium/Medium  No/Yes  Flexibly SE  
PSM  Low  High/Low  Yes/Yes  Low Rx complexity  
QSM  1  Medium  Low/Low  No/Yes  Moderate SE and EE  
STBCSM  2  Medium  Medium/Medium  No/Yes 


VBLAST(ML)  High  Medium/High  No/Yes  High SE  
Alamouti  Medium  Medium/Medium  No/Yes  High reliability  
IMOFDM  Medium  Low/Low  No/Yes  High EE  
IMOFDMIQ  Medium  Medium/Medium  No/Yes  High EE and moderate SE  
MIMOOFDMIM  High  High/High  No/Yes  High SE and moderate EE  
GSFIM  Medium  High/High  No/Yes  Flexible SE 
In order to comprehensively compare existing IM schemes, Table I gathers the RF chain number, SE, TX/RX complexity (computational complexity for encoding and decoding at the TX/RX), diversity order, CSI requirement, and key advantages of the schemes. One can conclude from the table that IM improves the system EE in terms of the hardware cost, computational complexity, and error performance and increases the SE by exploiting the potential of indexing in all available domains.
V Applications of IM
The implementation of IM in various communication scenarios is also a hot topic. The 5G communication system is expected to accommodate several emerging communication technologies such as massive MIMO, cooperative networks, and full duplex radios as well as supporting the qualityofservice requirements in challenging environments such as the high mobility scenario. In order to better meet such needs, the basic IM techniques should be further tailored and extensive theoretical studies are needed.
Va IM in Massive MIMO
Massive MIMO has been recognized as one of the key techniques in 5G. With hundreds of antennas at the base station, the SE can be significantly boosted and the multiuser interference can be eliminated. Precoding is a natural way of integrating IM techniques into multiuser massive MIMO downlink [10]. Data transmission to multiple users can be accommodated in the same frequency band via space division multiple access, and the detection complexity can also be reduced when multiple antennas are equipped at user terminals, because the data streams transmitted to the receive antennas are well isolated by linear precoding at the base station. On the other hand, SM can be applied at the base station in single user massive MIMO downlink to reduce the number of required RF chains [13].
VB IM in Full Duplex Communication
Full duplex is a promising technique for achieving high SE in wireless systems by transmitting and receiving radio signals simultaneously at the same frequency at a communication node. Consider a communication node equipped only with halfduplex antennas, to facilitate full duplex operation, the node will need multiple antennas and each antenna can not perform reception and transmission simultaneously. By applying SM at the communication nodes and using synchronized switches to select the transmit and the receive RF chains to carry additional information, the data rate can be significantly improved without any increase of complexity[4]. This idea is also extended to the decodeandforward full duplex relay scenarios by selecting the active antenna index at the relay to convey additional information.
VC IM in Cooperative Communication
Cooperative communication is widely considered to have promising potential of lower cost, improved SE, and extended coverage. Naturally, the combination of IM with cooperative communication is also drawing increasing attention. Generally, cooperative IM schemes can be classified according to where IM is applied: 1) dualhop/multihop IM, where IM is applied at the source, and the destination is served with the help of one or more amplifyandforward or decodeandforward relays; 2) distributed IM, where IM is formed at distributed relay nodes according to the information transmitted from the source node; and 3) network coded IM, where IM is utilized at either the source or the relay node in a twoway relay network. Due to the nature of exploiting the antenna index for information transmission, existing studies mainly focus on the potential of applying SM or DSM in cooperative communication systems
[14]. The combination of cooperative communication with other IM schemes remains to be investigated.VD IM in HighMobility Scenarios
The rapid progress of the highspeed railway systems brings about the urgent need of high data rate wireless communications in high mobility scenarios. Due to the significant Doppler, the accurate estimation of CSI will markedly improve the system complexity and the bandwidth cost. Therefore, noncoherent detection may be more preferable in high mobility. DSM is reported to have 3dB performance loss than SM. With channel estimation errors and preamble overhead in high mobility scenarios, DSM may demonstrate improved performance. However, the design of differential IM schemes in other domains still remains to be investigated.
IM schemes involving the frequency domain are also confronted with the challenging problem of ICI under significant Doppler. Careful design of effective ICI cancellation schemes is also an interesting issue. The unique properties of IM, such as the requirement of frequency domain interleaving, render classical ICI cancellation methods not directly applicable. Therefore, talored ICI cancellation design is an interesting problem. Readers may refer to [15] for further information.
Vi Challenges and Future Work
As a newly emerging technique, there are abundant appealing and challenging problems to be solved for IM, which we will discuss next.
Via IM in Space
IM in space can also be implemented to groups of antennas instead of individual ones. This applies to cases where the number of transmit antennas is greater than that of receive antennas and should be coupled with precoding, additional information bits can be modulated onto the group indices, therefore enhancing the SE.
ViB IM in Frequency
IM in the frequency domain can also be realized by assigning multiple modes to OFDM subcarriers. In existing IMOFDM systems, only two modes are permitted, namely null and conventional ary constellation, and the null mode itself cannot carry any information. Assigning more modes to a subcarrier is an effective means of improving SE.
ViC IM in Time
IM in the time domain is particularly suitable for singlecarrier transmissions and fast fading channels. Recall that the singlecarrier frequency domain equalization (SCFDE) transmitted signal is related to the frequencydomain finite constellation input via IFFT. Discarding some samples of the SCFDE signal will not induce noticeable effects to the system performance. Since the distortion can be compensated to some extent. The indices of the discarded samples can be then used to carry additional information.
ViD Potential Resources for IM
The existing work on IM inevitably sacrifice some degrees of freedom. A future direction is the exploration of some alternative resources for IM, for example, the pilot pattern. In highmobility communications, Pilots occupy a great fraction of space, time, and frequency resources. The exploitation of distinguishable pilot patterns for IM can be therefore an effective means to reduce the SE loss.
Apart from the IM design in contemporary 5G scenarios, the study of potential applications and other emerging scenarios such as wireless powered communication systems, simultaneous wireless information and power transfer, and nonorthogonal multiple access also consist of interesting and challenging problems that deserve further investigation. In a multiaccess setup, the overall network capacity should be investigated by accounting for the unused resources. This gives rise to another valuable and practical direction for future research.
Vii Conclusions
In this article, we introduced the concept of IM to improve the SE and EE for next generation communication systems. We have shown that with proper design, IM can be flexibly applied in space, frequency, and time domains. We have discussed various enhancements that are suitable for all IM schemes to further improve the data rate, applicability, and error performance. we also revealed the promising potentials of IM in massive MIMO, high mobility scenarios, and cooperative communication systems. Last but not least, we delineated the opportunities and challenges on the IM design for 5G.
References
 [1] E. Basar, “Index modulation techniques for 5G wireless networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 168175, July 2016.
 [2] M. Di Renzo, H. Haas, A. Ghrayeb, S. Sugiura, and L. Hanzo, “Spatial modulation for generalized MIMO: challenges, opportunities and implementation,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 56103, Jan. 2014
 [3] M. Wen, X. Cheng, M. Ma, B. Jiao and H. V. Poor, “On the achievable rate of OFDM with index modulation,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 19191932, Apr. 2016.
 [4] M. Wen, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, Index Modulation for 5G Wireless Communications, Springer, 2017.
 [5] E. Basar, “On multipleinput multipleoutput OFDM with index modulation for next generation wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., vol. 64, no. 15, pp. 38683878, Aug. 2016.
 [6] T. Datta, H. S. Eshwaraiah and A. Chockalingam, “Generalized spaceandfrequency index modulation,” IEEE Trans. Vehic. Techn., vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 49114924, July 2016.
 [7] T. Maksymyuk, L. Han, X. Ge, H. H. Chen, and M. Jo, “Quasiquadrature modulation method for powerefficient video transmission over LTE networks , IEEE Trans. Vehic. Techn., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 20832092, June. 2014.
 [8] R. Mesleh, S. S. Ikki, and H. M. Aggoune, “Quadrature spatial modulation,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 27382742, June 2015.
 [9] B. Zheng, F. Chen, M. Wen, F. Ji, H. Yu, and Y. Liu, “Lowcomplexity ML detector and performance analysis for OFDM with inphase/quadrature index modulation,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 18931896, Nov. 2015.
 [10] A. Stavridis, M. D. Renzo and H. Haas, “Performance analysis of multistream receive spatial modulation in the MIMO broadcast channel,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 18081820, Mar. 2016.
 [11] E. Basar, U. Aygolu, E. Panayirci and H. V. Poor, “Spacetime block coded spatial modulation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 823832, Mar. 2011.
 [12] E. Basar, “OFDM With Index Modulation Using Coordinate Interleaving,” IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 381384, Aug. 2015.
 [13] D. Basnayaka; M. Di Renzo; H. Haas, “Massive but few active MIMO,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 68616877, Sept. 2016.
 [14] M. Zhang, M. Wen, X. Cheng, and L. Yang, “A dualhop virtual MIMO architecture based on hybrid differential spatial modulation,” IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 63566370, Sept. 2016.
 [15] M. Wen, X. Cheng, L. Yang, Y. Li, X. Cheng, and F. Ji, “Index modulated OFDM for underwater acoustic communications,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 132137, May 2016.
Biographies
Xiang Cheng (xiangcheng@pku.edu.cn) received the PhD degree from HeriotWatt University and the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, U.K., in 2009, where he received the Postgraduate Research Thesis Prize. He is currently an Associate Professor at Peking University. His general research interests are in areas of channel modeling and communications. Dr. Cheng was the recipient of the IEEE Asia Pacific (AP) Outstanding Young Researcher Award in 2015, and Best Paper Awards at IEEE ITST 12, ICCC 13, and ITSC 14. He has served as Symposium LeadingChair, CoChair, and a Member of the Technical Program Committee for several international conferences. He is now an Associate Editor for IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
Meng Zhang (zhangmeng.bri@chinatelecom.cn) received the B.S. degree and the M.S. degree both from the School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing, China, in 2014 and 2017, respectively. He is currently an engineer at China Telecom Technology Innovation Center, Beijing, China. His research interests include spatial modulation, OFDM, and wireless powered communications.
Miaowen Wen (eemwwen@scut.edu.cn) received the B.S. degree from Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, in 2009, and Ph.D. degree from Peking University, Beijing, China, in 2014. From September 2012 to September 2013, he was a Visiting Student Research Collaborator with Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. He is currently an Associate Professor with the South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China. His research interests include index modulation, underwater acoustic communications, and nonorthogonal multiple access techniques. Dr. Wen was the recipient of Best Paper Awards at IEEE ITST12, ITSC14, and ICNC16. He has served as a Member of the Technical Program Committee for several international conferences. He is now an Associate Editor of the IEEE Access, and on the Editorial Board of the EURASIP journal on Wireless Communications and Networking and the ETRI Journal.
Liuqing Yang (lqyang@engr.colostate.edu) received her Ph.D. degree from the University of Minnesota in 2004. She is currently a Professor at Colorado State University. Her general interests are in areas of communications and signal processing. Dr. Yang was the recipient of the ONR YIP award in 2007, the NSF CAREER award in 2009, the IEEE Globecom Outstanding Service Award in 2010, George T. Abell Outstanding MidCareer Faculty Award at CSU in 2012, and Best Paper Awards at IEEE ICUWB 06, ICCC 13, ITSC 14, and GLOBECOM 14. She has been actively serving the technical community, including organization of many IEEE international conferences, and the editorial board for a number of journals including IEEE Transactions on Communications, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, and IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
Comments
There are no comments yet.