Identity Signals in Emoji Do not Influence Perception of Factual Truth on Twitter

by   Alexander Robertson, et al.

Prior work has shown that Twitter users use skin-toned emoji as an act of self-representation to express their racial/ethnic identity. We test whether this signal of identity can influence readers' perceptions about the content of a post containing that signal. In a large scale (n=944) pre-registered controlled experiment, we manipulate the presence of skin-toned emoji and profile photos in a task where readers rate obscure trivia facts (presented as tweets) as true or false. Using a Bayesian statistical analysis, we find that neither emoji nor profile photo has an effect on how readers rate these facts. This result will be of some comfort to anyone concerned about the manipulation of online users through the crafting of fake profiles.



There are no comments yet.


page 4


Black or White but never neutral: How readers perceive identity from yellow or skin-toned emoji

Research in sociology and linguistics shows that people use language not...

Skin Tone Emoji and Sentiment on Twitter

In 2015, the Unicode Consortium introduced five skin tone emoji that can...

Word Embeddings to Enhance Twitter Gang Member Profile Identification

Gang affiliates have joined the masses who use social media to share tho...

What sets Verified Users apart? Insights, Analysis and Prediction of Verified Users on Twitter

Social network and publishing platforms, such as Twitter, support the co...

Forex trading and Twitter: Spam, bots, and reputation manipulation

Currency trading (Forex) is the largest world market in terms of volume....

Is change the only constant? Profile change perspective on #LokSabhaElections2019

Users on Twitter are identified with the help of their profile attribute...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.