Humans Are Easily Fooled by Digital Images

09/17/2015
by   Victor Schetinger, et al.
0

Digital images are ubiquitous in our modern lives, with uses ranging from social media to news, and even scientific papers. For this reason, it is crucial evaluate how accurate people are when performing the task of identify doctored images. In this paper, we performed an extensive user study evaluating subjects capacity to detect fake images. After observing an image, users have been asked if it had been altered or not. If the user answered the image has been altered, he had to provide evidence in the form of a click on the image. We collected 17,208 individual answers from 383 users, using 177 images selected from public forensic databases. Different from other previously studies, our method propose different ways to avoid lucky guess when evaluating users answers. Our results indicate that people show inaccurate skills at differentiating between altered and non-altered images, with an accuracy of 58 user features such as age, answering time, confidence, providing deep analysis of how such variables influence on the users' performance.

READ FULL TEXT

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset