How to Measure Evidence: Bayes Factors or Relative Belief Ratios?

01/21/2023
by   Luai Al Labadi, et al.
0

Both the Bayes factor and the relative belief ratio satisfy the principle of evidence and so can be seen to be valid measures of statistical evidence. The question then is: which of these measures of evidence is more appropriate? Certainly Bayes factors are commonly used. It is argued here that there are questions concerning the validity of a current commonly used definition of the Bayes factor and, when all is considered, the relative belief ratio is a much more appropriate measure of evidence. Several general criticisms of these measures of evidence are also discussed and addressed.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
12/11/2022

A scale of interpretation for likelihood ratios and Bayes factors

Several subjective proposals have been made for interpreting the strengt...
research
06/22/2019

The Measurement of Statistical Evidence as the Basis for Statistical Reasoning

There are various approaches to the problem of how one is supposed to co...
research
06/09/2021

Calculating the Likelihood Ratio for Multiple Pieces of Evidence

When presenting forensic evidence, such as a DNA match, experts often us...
research
05/08/2019

Confirmatory Factor Analysis -- A Case study

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is a particular form of factor analys...
research
02/14/2022

Temporal Properties of Vaccine Effectiveness Measures in Presence of Multiple Pathogen Variants and Multiple Vaccines

Vaccine effectiveness (VE) is typically defined as incidence rate ratio,...
research
02/07/2022

Combining Evidence

The problem of combining the evidence concerning an unknown, contained i...
research
09/16/2022

Computing analytic Bayes factors from summary statistics in repeated-measures designs

Bayes factors are an increasingly popular tool for indexing evidence fro...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset