How Frequently are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited

12/21/2019
by   Bo-Christer Björk, et al.
0

Predatory journals are Open Access journals of highly questionable scientific quality. Such journals pretend to use peer review for quality assurance, and spam academics with requests for submissions, in order to collect author payments. In recent years predatory journals have received a lot of negative media. While much has been said about the harm that such journals cause to academic publishing in general, an overlooked aspect is how much articles in such journals are actually read and in particular cited, that is if they have any significant impact on the research in their fields. Other studies have already demonstrated that only some of the articles in predatory journals contain faulty and directly harmful results, while a lot of the articles present mediocre and poorly reported studies. We studied citation statistics over a five-year period in Google Scholar for 250 random articles published in such journals in 2014, and found an average of 2,6 citations per article and that 60 sample of articles published in the approximately 25,000 peer reviewed journals included in the Scopus index had an average of 18,1 citations in the same period with only 9 published in predatory journals have little scientific impact.

READ FULL TEXT
POST COMMENT

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Authors

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

02/04/2022

The influence of funding on the Open Access citation advantage

Some of the citation advantage in open access is likely due to more acce...
08/23/2019

Ten years of research on ResearchGate, a scoping review using Google Scholar 2008_2017

Objective. To analyse quantitatively the articles published during 2008_...
08/13/2012

A Plea for Neutral Comparison Studies in Computational Sciences

In a context where most published articles are devoted to the developmen...
12/15/2019

Hunting for supernovae articles in the universe of scientometrics

This short note records an unusual situation with some Google Scholar's ...
06/28/2017

Classic papers: déjà vu, a step further in the bibliometric exploitation of Google Scholar

After giving a brief overview of Eugene Garfield contributions to the is...
08/26/2020

MetaMetaZipf. What do analyses of city size distributions have in common?

In this article, I conduct a textual and contextual analysis of the empi...
05/13/2019

On the share of mathematics published by Elsevier and Springer

For-profit editors such as Elsevier and Springer have been subject to su...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.