Log In Sign Up

hα: The Scientist as Chimpanzee or Bonobohα: The Scientist as Chimpanzee or Bonobo

by   Loet Leydesdorff, et al.

In a recent paper, Hirsch (2018) proposes to attribute the credit for a co-authored paper to the α-author--the author with the highest h-index--regardless of his or her actual contribution, effectively reducing the role of the other co-authors to zero. The indicator hα inherits most of the disadvantages of the h-index from which it is derived, but adds the normative element of reinforcing the Matthew effect in science. Using an example, we show that hα can be extremely unstable. The empirical attribution of credit among co-authors is not captured by abstract models such as h, h_bar , or hα.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


hα: The Scientist as Chimpanzee or Bonobo

In a recent paper, Hirsch (2018) proposes to attribute the credit for a ...

Crediting multi-authored papers to single authors

A fair assignment of credit for multi-authored publications is a long-st...

Arbitrage opportunities in publication and ghost authors

In some research evaluation systems, credit awarded to an article depend...

Co-author weighting in bibliometric methodology and subfields of a scientific discipline

Collaborative work and co-authorship are fundamental to the advancement ...

The quality of the Web of Science data: a longitudinal study on the completeness of authors-addresses links

The author-affiliation links are the essential elements used for multipl...

Does the h_α index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R

Recently, Hirsch (2019a) proposed a new variant of the h index called th...

Siamese Networks for Large-Scale Author Identification

Authorship attribution is the process of identifying the author of a tex...