Guessing What's Plausible But Remembering What's True: Accurate Neural Reasoning for Question-Answering
share
Neural approaches to natural language processing (NLP) often fail at the logical reasoning needed for deeper language understanding. In particular, neural approaches to reasoning that rely on embedded generalizations of a knowledge base (KB) implicitly model which facts that are plausible, but may not model which facts are true, according to the KB. While generalizing the facts in a KB is useful for KB completion, the inability to distinguish between plausible inferences and logically entailed conclusions can be problematic in settings like as KB question answering (KBQA). We propose here a novel KB embedding scheme that supports generalization, but also allows accurate logical reasoning with a KB. Our approach introduces two new mechanisms for KB reasoning: neural retrieval over a set of embedded triples, and "memorization" of highly specific information with a compact sketch structure. Experimentally, this leads to substantial improvements over the state-of-the-art on two KBQA benchmarks.
READ FULL TEXT
