Greater search cost reduces prices

04/02/2020
by   Sander Heinsalu, et al.
0

The optimal price of each firm falls in the search cost of consumers, in the limit to the monopoly price, despite the exit of lower-value consumers in response to costlier search. Exit means that fewer inframarginal consumers remain. The decrease in marginal buyers is smaller, because part of demand is composed of customers coming from rival firms. These buyers can be held up and are not marginal. Higher search cost reduces the fraction of incoming switchers among buyers, which decreases the hold-up motive, thus the price.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/05/2023

Arbitrageurs' profits, LVR, and sandwich attacks: batch trading as an AMM design response

We consider an automated market maker (AMM) in which all trades are batc...
research
02/16/2020

An optimal mechanism charging for priority in a queue

We derive a revenue-maximizing scheme that charges customers who are hom...
research
09/10/2018

Cloud Index Tracking: Enabling Predictable Costs in Cloud Spot Markets

Cloud spot markets rent VMs for a variable price that is typically much ...
research
10/08/2019

Predicting Auction Price of Vehicle License Plate with Deep Residual Learning

Due to superstition, license plates with desirable combinations of chara...
research
05/14/2019

Capacity and Price Competition in Markets with Congestion Effects

We study oligopolistic competition in service markets where firms offer ...
research
11/26/2018

Estimation of a Nonseparable Heterogeneous Demand Function with Shape Restrictions and Berkson Errors

Berkson errors are commonplace in empirical microeconomics and occur whe...
research
05/25/2020

No Reservations: A First Look at Amazon's Reserved Instance Marketplace

Cloud users can significantly reduce their cost (by up to 60%) by reserv...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset