Graphics Turing Test

03/31/2006 ∙ by Michael McGuigan, et al. ∙ Brookhaven National Laboratory 0

We define a Graphics Turing Test to measure graphics performance in a similar manner to the definition of the traditional Turing Test. To pass the test one needs to reach a computational scale, the Graphics Turing Scale, for which Computer Generated Imagery becomes comparatively indistinguishable from real images while also being interactive. We derive an estimate for this computational scale which, although large, is within reach of todays supercomputers. We consider advantages and disadvantages of various computer systems designed to pass the Graphics Turing Test. Finally we discuss commercial applications from the creation of such a system, in particular Interactive Cinema.



There are no comments yet.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.


  • [1] A. M. Turing ”Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, Mind 49, 433 (1950).
  • [2] A. P. Saygin, I. Cicekli and V. Akman, ’Turing Test: 50 Years Later’, Minds and Machines 10, 463 (2000).
  • [3] D. Barberi, ”The Ultimate Turing Test”, (1992).
  • [4] P. Debevec, ”The Parthenon”, SIGGRAPH 2004 Electronic Theater, (2004).
  • [5] S. Tomov , R. Bennett , M. McGuigan , A. Peskin , G. Smith and J. Spiletic, ”Application of interactive parallel visualization for commodity-based clusters using visualization APIs”, Computers & Graphics, 28, 273 (2004).
  • [6] C. Batty, M. Wiebe, B. Houston, ”Frantic Films - High Performance Production-Quality Fluid Simulation via NVIDIA’s QuadroFX” ,
  • [7] S. Tomov, M. McGuigan, R. Bennett, G. Smith and J. Spiletic, ”Benchmarking and implementation of probability-based simulations on programmable graphics cards”, Computers & Graphics, 29, 71 (2005).
  • [8] Z. Fan, F. Qiu, A. Kaufman, S. Yoakum-Stover ”GPU Cluster for High Performance Computing”, Proceedings ACM / IEEE Supercomputing Conference (2004).
  • [9] N. Christ, ”QCDOC System Overview and Project Status”, Proceedings of RIKEN BNL Research Center Workshop, High Performance Computing with QCDOC and BlueGene (2003).
  • [10] A. Gara, ”BlueGene Future Directions”, Proceedings of RIKEN BNL Research Center Workshop, High Performance Computing with QCDOC and BlueGene (2003).
  • [11] J. Ahrens, C. Law, K. Martin, M. Papka, W. Schroeder, ”A parallel approach for efficiently visualizing extremely large, time-varying data sets. Technical Report LAUR-00-1620, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM, USA, (2000).
  • [12] M. Kreuger, ”Artificial Reality II”, Addison Wesley, Massachusetts (1991).