Graph Neural Reasoning May Fail in Certifying Boolean Unsatisfiability

09/25/2019
by   Ziliang Chen, et al.
0

It is feasible and practically-valuable to bridge the characteristics between graph neural networks (GNNs) and logical reasoning. Despite considerable efforts and successes witnessed to solve Boolean satisfiability (SAT), it remains a mystery of GNN-based solvers for more complex predicate logic formulae. In this work, we conjectures with some evidences, that generally-defined GNNs present several limitations to certify the unsatisfiability (UNSAT) in Boolean formulae. It implies that GNNs may probably fail in learning the logical reasoning tasks if they contain proving UNSAT as the sub-problem included by most predicate logic formulae.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
09/25/2019

Graph Neural Reasoning May Fail in Proving Boolean Unsatisfiability

It is feasible and practically-valuable to bridge the characteristics be...
research
11/15/2021

Can Graph Neural Networks Learn to Solve MaxSAT Problem?

With the rapid development of deep learning techniques, various recent w...
research
02/12/2017

Graph Neural Networks and Boolean Satisfiability

In this paper we explore whether or not deep neural architectures can le...
research
05/09/2022

Graph Neural Networks for Propositional Model Counting

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been recently leveraged to solve sever...
research
03/14/2023

Gamora: Graph Learning based Symbolic Reasoning for Large-Scale Boolean Networks

Reasoning high-level abstractions from bit-blasted Boolean networks (BNs...
research
04/27/2019

Graph Neural Reasoning for 2-Quantified Boolean Formula Solvers

In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of learning GNN (Graph Neu...
research
06/05/2019

Can Graph Neural Networks Help Logic Reasoning?

Effectively combining logic reasoning and probabilistic inference has be...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset