GOTO Rankings Considered Helpful

06/29/2018
by   Emery Berger, et al.
0

Rankings are a fact of life. Whether or not one likes them, they exist and are influential. Within academia, and in computer science in particular, rankings not only capture our attention but also widely influence people who have a limited understanding of computing science research, including prospective students, university administrators, and policy-makers. In short, rankings matter. This position paper advocates for the adoption of "GOTO rankings": rankings that use Good data, are Open, Transparent, and Objective, and the rejection of rankings that do not meet these criteria.

READ FULL TEXT
research
08/28/2019

A Longitudinal Analysis of University Rankings

In this paper the ARWU, THE and QS global university rankings are studie...
research
06/04/2018

Rigging Research Results by Manipulating Top Websites Rankings

Researchers often use rankings of popular websites when measuring securi...
research
11/17/2020

Are University Rankings Statistically Significant? A Comparison among Chinese Universities and with the USA

Purpose: We address the question of whether differences are statisticall...
research
11/05/2022

Rankers, Rankees, Rankings: Peeking into the Pandora's Box from a Socio-Technical Perspective

Algorithmic rankers have a profound impact on our increasingly data-driv...
research
06/07/2017

Analyzing the disciplinary focus of universities: Can rankings be a one-size-fits-all?

The phenomenon of rankings is intimately related with the government int...
research
12/21/2021

Startup Ecosystem Rankings

The number, importance, and popularity of rankings measuring innovation ...
research
03/18/2023

Detect influential points of feature rankings

Background Deriving feature rankings is essential in bioinformatics stud...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset