FSE/CACM Rebuttal^2: Correcting A Large-Scale Study of Programming Languages and Code Quality in GitHub

11/27/2019
by   Emery D. Berger, et al.
0

Ray, Devanbu and Filkov issued a rebuttal of our TOPLAS paper "On the Impact of Programming Languages on Code Quality: A Reproduction Study". Our paper reproduced "A Large-Scale Study of Programming Languages and Code Quality in GitHub", which appeared at FSE 2014 and was subsequently republished as a CACM research highlight in 2017. This article is a rebuttal to that rebuttal.

READ FULL TEXT

page 5

page 8

page 9

page 10

page 11

page 12

page 13

research
01/29/2019

On the Impact of Programming Languages on Code Quality

This paper is a reproduction of work by Ray et al. which claimed to have...
research
04/17/2018

Deep Probabilistic Programming Languages: A Qualitative Study

Deep probabilistic programming languages try to combine the advantages o...
research
11/24/2021

Systematic Analysis of Programming Languages and Their Execution Environments for Spectre Attacks

In this paper, we analyze the security of programming languages and thei...
research
11/18/2021

Measuring source code conciseness across programming languages using compression

It is well-known, and often a topic of heated debates, that programs in ...
research
08/08/2023

A Comparative Study of Code Generation using ChatGPT 3.5 across 10 Programming Languages

Large Language Models (LLMs) are advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI) s...
research
07/15/2021

Duplicated Code Pattern Mining in Visual Programming Languages

Visual Programming Languages (VPLs), coupled with the high-level abstrac...
research
07/20/2020

Jupyter Notebooks on GitHub: Characteristics and Code Clones

Jupyter notebooks have emerged as a standard tool for data science progr...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset