From Probability to Consilience: How Explanatory Values Implement Bayesian Reasoning

06/03/2020
by   Zachary Wojtowicz, et al.
8

Recent work in cognitive science has uncovered a diversity of explanatory values, or dimensions along which we judge explanations as better or worse. We propose a Bayesian account of how these values fit together to guide explanation. The resulting taxonomy provides a set of predictors for which explanations people prefer and shows how core values from psychology, statistics, and the philosophy of science emerge from a common mathematical framework. In addition to operationalizing the explanatory virtues associated with, for example, scientific argument-making, this framework also enables us to reinterpret the explanatory vices that drive conspiracy theories, delusions, and extremist ideologies.

READ FULL TEXT

page 4

page 5

page 10

research
10/29/2019

Weight of Evidence as a Basis for Human-Oriented Explanations

Interpretability is an elusive but highly sought-after characteristic of...
research
06/27/2023

Delivering Inflated Explanations

In the quest for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) one of the qu...
research
02/09/2023

Explanation Selection Using Unlabeled Data for In-Context Learning

Recent work has addressed textual reasoning tasks by prompting large lan...
research
10/31/2022

Towards Human Cognition Level-based Experiment Design for Counterfactual Explanations (XAI)

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has recently gained a swell of...
research
02/16/2023

On the Impact of Explanations on Understanding of Algorithmic Decision-Making

Ethical principles for algorithms are gaining importance as more and mor...
research
10/07/2021

From the Head or the Heart? An Experimental Design on the Impact of Explanation on Cognitive and Affective Trust

Automated vehicles (AVs) are social robots that can potentially benefit ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset