Formalizing Scenario Analysis

by   Peter McBurney, et al.

We propose a formal treatment of scenarios in the context of a dialectical argumentation formalism for qualitative reasoning about uncertain propositions. Our formalism extends prior work in which arguments for and against uncertain propositions were presented and compared in interaction spaces called Agoras. We now define the notion of a scenario in this framework and use it to define a set of qualitative uncertainty labels for propositions across a collection of scenarios. This work is intended to lead to a formal theory of scenarios and scenario analysis.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

page 7

page 8


Dealing with Qualitative and Quantitative Features in Legal Domains

In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a for...

Risk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning

We propose a formal framework for intelligent systems which can reason a...

A Logic Programming Framework for Possibilistic Argumentation with Vague Knowledge

Defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setti...

Resolving Conflicting Arguments under Uncertainties

Distributed knowledge based applications in open domain rely on common s...

A Note on Rich Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks

Recently, qualitative uncertainty in abstract argumentation has received...

Exceptional Subclasses in Qualitative Probability

System Z+ [Goldszmidt and Pearl, 1991, Goldszmidt, 1992] is a formalism ...