Formalizing Scenario Analysis

12/12/2012
by   Peter McBurney, et al.
0

We propose a formal treatment of scenarios in the context of a dialectical argumentation formalism for qualitative reasoning about uncertain propositions. Our formalism extends prior work in which arguments for and against uncertain propositions were presented and compared in interaction spaces called Agoras. We now define the notion of a scenario in this framework and use it to define a set of qualitative uncertainty labels for propositions across a collection of scenarios. This work is intended to lead to a formal theory of scenarios and scenario analysis.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

page 7

page 8

research
03/05/2019

Dealing with Qualitative and Quantitative Features in Legal Domains

In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a for...
research
10/21/2022

Modelling Control Arguments via Cooperation Logic in Unforeseen Scenarios

The intent of control argumentation frameworks is to specifically model ...
research
03/30/2023

URSID: Using formalism to Refine attack Scenarios for vulnerable Infrastructure Deployment

In this paper we propose a novel way of deploying vulnerable architectur...
research
01/16/2013

Risk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning

We propose a formal framework for intelligent systems which can reason a...
research
01/30/2013

Resolving Conflicting Arguments under Uncertainties

Distributed knowledge based applications in open domain rely on common s...
research
03/13/2013

Representing Context-Sensitive Knowledge in a Network Formalism: A Preliminary Report

Automated decision making is often complicated by the complexity of the ...
research
02/27/2013

Exceptional Subclasses in Qualitative Probability

System Z+ [Goldszmidt and Pearl, 1991, Goldszmidt, 1992] is a formalism ...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset