Fixing Bias in Zipf's Law Estimators Using Approximate Bayesian Computation

08/03/2020
by   Charlie Pilgrim, et al.
0

The prevailing Bayesian maximum likelihood estimators for inferring power law models from rank-frequency data are biased. The source of this bias is an inappropriate likelihood function. The correct likelihood function is derived and shown to be computationally intractable. A more computationally efficient method of approximate Bayesian computation is described that estimates Zipf exponents for large datasets without bias.

READ FULL TEXT
research
05/22/2016

The De-Biased Whittle Likelihood

The Whittle likelihood is a widely used and computationally efficient ps...
research
04/08/2020

Bayesian Computation with Intractable Likelihoods

This article surveys computational methods for posterior inference with ...
research
01/13/2023

Tunable robustness in power-law inference

Power-law probability distributions arise often in the social and natura...
research
04/19/2013

Austerity in MCMC Land: Cutting the Metropolis-Hastings Budget

Can we make Bayesian posterior MCMC sampling more efficient when faced w...
research
12/05/2018

Information geometry for approximate Bayesian computation

The goal of this paper is to explore the basic Approximate Bayesian Comp...
research
07/19/2017

Learning Approximate Neural Estimators for Wireless Channel State Information

Estimation is a critical component of synchronization in wireless and si...
research
02/02/2020

Bayesian Reliability Analysis of the Power Law Process with Respect to the Higgins-Tsokos Loss Function for Modeling Software Failure Times

The Power Law Process, also known as Non-Homogeneous Poisson Process, ha...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset