Fiducial Inference and Decision Theory

12/13/2021
by   G. Taraldsen, et al.
0

The majority of the statisticians concluded many decades ago that fiducial inference was nonsensical to them. Hannig et al. (2016) and others have, however, contributed to a renewed interest and focus. Fiducial inference is similar to Bayesian analysis, but without requiring a prior. The prior information is replaced by assuming a particular data generating equation. Berger (1985) explains that Bayesian analysis and statistical decision theory are in harmony. Taraldsen and Lindqvist (2013) show that fiducial theory and statistical decision theory also play well together. The purpose of this text is to explain and exemplify this together with recent mathematical results.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/29/2021

A category theory framework for Bayesian learning

Inspired by the foundational works by Spivak and Fong and Cruttwell et a...
research
05/31/2023

A Comparison of Decision Algorithms on Newcomblike Problems

When formulated using Bayesian networks, two standard decision algorithm...
research
07/18/2023

Deterministic Objective Bayesian Analysis for Spatial Models

Berger et al. (2001) and Ren et al. (2012) derived noninformative priors...
research
02/18/2020

The Mathematical Structure of Integrated Information Theory

Integrated Information Theory is one of the leading models of consciousn...
research
04/10/2018

Information theory for fields

A physical field has an infinite number of degrees of freedom, as it has...
research
12/08/2021

Deep Learning and Mathematical Intuition: A Review of (Davies et al. 2021)

A recent paper by Davies et al (2021) describes how deep learning (DL) t...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset