FDB: Fraud Dataset Benchmark
share
Standardized datasets and benchmarks have spurred innovations in computer vision, natural language processing, multi-modal and tabular settings. We note that, as compared to other well researched fields fraud detection has numerous differences. The differences include a high class imbalance, diverse feature types, frequently changing fraud patterns, and adversarial nature of the problem. Due to these differences, the modeling approaches that are designed for other classification tasks may not work well for the fraud detection. We introduce Fraud Dataset Benchmark (FDB), a compilation of publicly available datasets catered to fraud detection. FDB comprises variety of fraud related tasks, ranging from identifying fraudulent card-not-present transactions, detecting bot attacks, classifying malicious URLs, predicting risk of loan to content moderation. The Python based library from FDB provides consistent API for data loading with standardized training and testing splits. For reference, we also provide baseline evaluations of different modeling approaches on FDB. Considering the increasing popularity of Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) for various research and business problems, we used AutoML frameworks for our baseline evaluations. For fraud prevention, the organizations that operate with limited resources and lack ML expertise often hire a team of investigators, use blocklists and manual rules, all of which are inefficient and do not scale well. Such organizations can benefit from AutoML solutions that are easy to deploy in production and pass the bar of fraud prevention requirements. We hope that FDB helps in the development of customized fraud detection techniques catered to different fraud modus operandi (MOs) as well as in the improvement of AutoML systems that can work well for all datasets in the benchmark.
READ FULL TEXT
