Fairness Under Composition

06/15/2018
by   Cynthia Dwork, et al.
0

Much of the literature on fair classifiers considers the case of a single classifier used once, in isolation. We initiate the study of composition of fair classifiers. In particular, we address the pitfalls of naıve composition and give general constructions for fair composition. Focusing on the individual fairness setting proposed in [Dwork, Hardt, Pitassi, Reingold, Zemel, 2011], we also extend our results to a large class of group fairness definitions popular in the recent literature. We exhibit several cases in which group fairness definitions give misleading signals under composition and conclude that additional context is needed to evaluate both group and individual fairness under composition.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/11/2021

Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolation

Training classifiers under fairness constraints such as group fairness, ...
research
12/14/2019

On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairness

A distinction has been drawn in fair machine learning research between `...
research
08/21/2020

Beyond Individual and Group Fairness

We present a new data-driven model of fairness that, unlike existing sta...
research
01/25/2023

Group fairness in dynamic refugee assignment

Ensuring that refugees and asylum seekers thrive (e.g., find employment)...
research
09/04/2020

Fair and Useful Cohort Selection

As important decisions about the distribution of society's resources bec...
research
03/23/2022

Improving the Fairness of Chest X-ray Classifiers

Deep learning models have reached or surpassed human-level performance i...
research
05/26/2020

Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine Learning

A review of the main fairness definitions and fair learning methodologie...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset