Fair Prediction with Endogenous Behavior

by   Christopher Jung, et al.

There is increasing regulatory interest in whether machine learning algorithms deployed in consequential domains (e.g. in criminal justice) treat different demographic groups "fairly." However, there are several proposed notions of fairness, typically mutually incompatible. Using criminal justice as an example, we study a model in which society chooses an incarceration rule. Agents of different demographic groups differ in their outside options (e.g. opportunity for legal employment) and decide whether to commit crimes. We show that equalizing type I and type II errors across groups is consistent with the goal of minimizing the overall crime rate; other popular notions of fairness are not.


page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4


DeBayes: a Bayesian method for debiasing network embeddings

As machine learning algorithms are increasingly deployed for high-impact...

Convergent Algorithms for (Relaxed) Minimax Fairness

We consider a recently introduced framework in which fairness is measure...

Model Mis-specification and Algorithmic Bias

Machine learning algorithms are increasingly used to inform critical dec...

Maximum Weighted Loss Discrepancy

Though machine learning algorithms excel at minimizing the average loss ...

Violent Crime in London: An Investigation using Geographically Weighted Regression

Violent crime in London is an area of increasing interest following poli...

Fair clustering via equitable group representations

What does it mean for a clustering to be fair? One popular approach seek...

An example of prediction which complies with Demographic Parity and equalizes group-wise risks in the context of regression

Let (X, S, Y) ∈ℝ^p ×{1, 2}×ℝ be a triplet following some joint distribut...