Fair Policy Targeting

05/25/2020
by   Davide Viviano, et al.
0

One of the major concerns of targeting interventions on individuals in social welfare programs is discrimination: individualized treatments may induce disparities on sensitive attributes such as age, gender, or race. This paper addresses the question of the design of fair and efficient treatment allocation rules. We adopt the non-maleficence perspective of "first do no harm": we propose to select the fairest allocation within the Pareto frontier. We provide envy-freeness justifications to novel counterfactual notions of fairness. We discuss easy-to-implement estimators of the policy function, by casting the optimization into a mixed-integer linear program formulation. We derive regret bounds on the unfairness of the estimated policy function, and small sample guarantees on the Pareto frontier. Finally, we illustrate our method using an application from education economics.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/16/2020

Policy choice in experiments with unknown interference

This paper discusses experimental design for inference and estimation of...
research
06/24/2019

Policy Targeting under Network Interference

The empirical analysis of experiments and quasi-experiments often seeks ...
research
02/26/2023

Envy-freeness and maximum Nash welfare for mixed divisible and indivisible goods

We study fair allocation of resources consisting of both divisible and i...
research
11/29/2020

Sequential Fair Allocation of Limited Resources under Stochastic Demands

We consider the problem of dividing limited resources between a set of a...
research
05/01/2019

Fair Classification and Social Welfare

Now that machine learning algorithms lie at the center of many resource ...
research
05/28/2017

Optimal dynamic treatment allocation

In a treatment allocation problem the individuals to be treated often ar...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset