Exploring Author Context for Detecting Intended vs Perceived Sarcasm

10/25/2019
by   Silviu Oprea, et al.
0

We investigate the impact of using author context on textual sarcasm detection. We define author context as the embedded representation of their historical posts on Twitter and suggest neural models that extract these representations. We experiment with two tweet datasets, one labelled manually for sarcasm, and the other via tag-based distant supervision. We achieve state-of-the-art performance on the second dataset, but not on the one labelled manually, indicating a difference between intended sarcasm, captured by distant supervision, and perceived sarcasm, captured by manual labelling.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/08/2019

iSarcasm: A Dataset of Intended Sarcasm

This paper considers the distinction between intended and perceived sarc...
research
09/12/2015

Improving distant supervision using inference learning

Distant supervision is a widely applied approach to automatic training o...
research
10/08/2021

Perceived and Intended Sarcasm Detection with Graph Attention Networks

Existing sarcasm detection systems focus on exploiting linguistic marker...
research
12/29/2016

Deep Learning Logo Detection with Data Expansion by Synthesising Context

Logo detection in unconstrained images is challenging, particularly when...
research
07/16/2021

Pseudo-labelling Enhanced Media Bias Detection

Leveraging unlabelled data through weak or distant supervision is a comp...
research
11/09/2016

When silver glitters more than gold: Bootstrapping an Italian part-of-speech tagger for Twitter

We bootstrap a state-of-the-art part-of-speech tagger to tag Italian Twi...
research
06/01/2020

Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter?

Moderation is crucial to promoting healthy on-line discussions. Although...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset