Evaluation of Local Model-Agnostic Explanations Using Ground Truth
share
Explanation techniques are commonly evaluated using human-grounded methods, limiting the possibilities for large-scale evaluations and rapid progress in the development of new techniques. We propose a functionally-grounded evaluation procedure for local model-agnostic explanation techniques. In our approach, we generate ground truth for explanations when the black-box model is Logistic Regression and Gaussian Naive Bayes and compare how similar each explanation is to the extracted ground truth. In our empirical study, explanations of Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Local Permutation Importance (LPI) are compared in terms of how similar they are to the extracted ground truth. In the case of Logistic Regression, we find that the performance of the explanation techniques is highly dependent on the normalization of the data. In contrast, Local Permutation Importance outperforms the other techniques on Naive Bayes, irrespective of normalization. We hope that this work lays the foundation for further research into functionally-grounded evaluation methods for explanation techniques.
READ FULL TEXT
