Ethnic Diversity Increases Scientific Impact

by   Bedoor K AlShebli, et al.

Inspired by the numerous social and economic benefits of diversity, we analyze over 9 million papers and 6 million scientists spanning 24 fields of study, to understand the relationship between research impact and five types of diversity, reflecting (i) ethnicity, (ii) discipline, (iii) gender, (iv) affiliation and (v) academic age. For each type, we study group diversity (i.e., the heterogeneity of a paper's set of authors) and individual diversity (i.e., the heterogeneity of a scientist's entire set of collaborators). Remarkably, of all the types considered, we find that ethnic diversity is the strongest predictor of a field's scientific impact (r is 0.77 and 0.55 for group and individual ethnic diversity, respectively). Moreover, to isolate the effect of ethnic diversity from other confounding factors, we analyze a baseline model in which author ethnicities are randomized while preserving all other characteristics. We find that the relation between ethnic diversity and impact is stronger in the real data compared to the randomized baseline model, regardless of publication year, number of authors per paper, and number of collaborators per scientist. Finally, we use coarsened exact matching to infer causality, whereby the scientific impact of diverse papers and scientists are compared against closely matched control groups. In keeping with the other results, we find that ethnic diversity consistently leads to higher scientific impact.


page 8

page 24

page 28

page 29


Diversity of Expertise is Key to Scientific Impact: a Large-Scale Analysis in the Field of Computer Science

Understanding the relationship between the composition of a research tea...

Gender inequality and self-publication patterns among scientific editors

Academic publishing is the principal medium of documenting and dissemina...

Diversity Breeds Innovation With Discounted Impact and Recognition

Prior work poses a diversity paradox for science. Diversity breeds scien...

Collaboration Diversity and Scientific Impact

The shift from individual effort to collaborative output has benefited s...

Citations and gender diversity in reciprocal acknowledgement networks

Acknowledgements in scientific articles suggest not only gratitude, but ...

Group segmentation and heterogeneity in the choice of cooking fuels in post-earthquake Nepal

Segmenting population into subgroups with higher intergroup, but lower i...

The Chaperone Effect in Scientific Publishing

Experience plays a critical role in crafting high impact scientific work...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset