Estimands and Inference in Cluster-Randomized Vaccine Trials

10/08/2019
by   Kayla W. Kilpatrick, et al.
0

Cluster-randomized trials are often conducted to assess vaccine effects. Defining estimands of interest before conducting a trial is integral to the alignment between a study's objectives and the data to be collected and analyzed. This paper considers estimands and estimators for overall, indirect, and total vaccine effects in trials where clusters of individuals are randomized to vaccine or control. The scenario is considered where individuals self-select whether to participate in the trial and the outcome of interest is measured on all individuals in each cluster. Unlike the overall, indirect, and total effects, the direct effect of vaccination is shown in general not to be estimable without further assumptions, such as no unmeasured confounding. An illustrative example motivated by a cluster-randomized typhoid vaccine trial is provided.

READ FULL TEXT
research
01/07/2022

New designs for Bayesian adaptive cluster-randomized trials

Adaptive approaches, allowing for more flexible trial design, have been ...
research
03/24/2023

Demystifying estimands in cluster-randomised trials

Estimands can help clarify the interpretation of treatment effects and e...
research
08/12/2022

Mediation Analyses for the Effect of Antibodies in Vaccination

We partition the total ratio effect (one minus the vaccine effect) from ...
research
04/26/2022

Outcome coding choice in randomized trials of programs to reduce violence

Over the last decade, the number of randomized trials of programs to red...
research
10/03/2021

Garbage Collection Makes Rust Easier to Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Bronze Garbage Collector

Rust is a general-purpose programming language that is both type- and me...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset