Equilibrium States in Numerical Argumentation Networks

08/28/2014
by   D. Gabbay, et al.
0

Given an argumentation network with initial values to the arguments, we look for algorithms which can yield extensions compatible with such initial values. We find that the best way of tackling this problem is to offer an iteration formula that takes the initial values and the attack relation and iterates a sequence of intermediate values that eventually converges leading to an extension. The properties surrounding the application of the iteration formula and its connection with other numerical and non-numerical techniques proposed by others are thoroughly investigated in this paper.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/09/2002

Collective Argumentation

An extension of an abstract argumentation framework, called collective a...
research
09/16/2020

An Imprecise Probability Approach for Abstract Argumentation based on Credal Sets

Some abstract argumentation approaches consider that arguments have a de...
research
03/18/2015

Probabilistic Argumentation. An Equational Approach

There is a generic way to add any new feature to a system. It involves 1...
research
07/22/2019

Aggregation in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks

Value-based argumentation enhances a classical abstract argumentation gr...
research
04/21/2022

Revisiting initial sets in abstract argumentation

We revisit the notion of initial sets by Xu and Cayrol, i.e., non-empty ...
research
07/19/2017

Argotario: Computational Argumentation Meets Serious Games

An important skill in critical thinking and argumentation is the ability...
research
01/15/2014

Predicting the Performance of IDA* using Conditional Distributions

Korf, Reid, and Edelkamp introduced a formula to predict the number of n...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset