Epistemological Relevance and Statistical Knowledge

03/27/2013
by   Henry E. Kyburg Jr, et al.
0

For many years, at least since McCarthy and Hayes (1969), writers have lamented, and attempted to compensate for, the alleged fact that we often do not have adequate statistical knowledge for governing the uncertainty of belief, for making uncertain inferences, and the like. It is hardly ever spelled out what "adequate statistical knowledge" would be, if we had it, and how adequate statistical knowledge could be used to control and regulate epistemic uncertainty.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

page 7

page 8

research
09/19/2017

Reasoning about proof and knowledge

In previous work [Lewitzka, 2017], we presented a hierarchy of classical...
research
06/16/2023

Is the Volume of a Credal Set a Good Measure for Epistemic Uncertainty?

Adequate uncertainty representation and quantification have become imper...
research
06/22/2021

Revisiting Epistemic Logic with Names

This paper revisits the multi-agent epistemic logic presented in [10], w...
research
06/22/2021

Epistemic Modality and Coordination under Uncertainty

Communication facilitates coordination, but coordination might fail if t...
research
10/23/2020

Generating Adequate Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions

This paper presents a novel approach to automatic generation of adequate...
research
05/09/2023

Bayes Linear Analysis for Statistical Modelling with Uncertain Inputs

Statistical models typically capture uncertainties in our knowledge of t...
research
12/04/2014

Knowledge, Justification, and Reason-Based Belief

Is knowledge definable as justified true belief ("JTB")? We argue that o...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset