Epistemic Selection of Costly Alternatives: The Case of Participatory Budgeting

04/21/2023
by   Simon Rey, et al.
0

We initiate the study of voting rules for participatory budgeting using the so-called epistemic approach, where one interprets votes as noisy reflections of some ground truth regarding the objectively best set of projects to fund. Using this approach, we first show that both the most studied rules in the literature and the most widely used rule in practice cannot be justified on epistemic grounds: they cannot be interpreted as maximum likelihood estimators, whatever assumptions we make about the accuracy of voters. Focusing then on welfare-maximising rules, we obtain both positive and negative results regarding epistemic guarantees.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
12/07/2021

Truth-tracking via Approval Voting: Size Matters

Epistemic social choice aims at unveiling a hidden ground truth given vo...
research
01/17/2022

Multi-winner Approval Voting Goes Epistemic

Epistemic voting interprets votes as noisy signals about a ground truth....
research
07/04/2022

A Permutation-Based Heuristic for Buy Low, Sell High

Buy low, sell high is one of the basic rules of thumb used in investment...
research
11/05/2022

A Filtering-based General Approach to Learning Rational Constraints of Epistemic Graphs

Epistemic graphs generalize the epistemic approach to probabilistic argu...
research
07/05/2021

Neyman-Pearson Hypothesis Testing, Epistemic Reliability and Pragmatic Value-Laden Asymmetric Error Risks

Neyman and Pearson's theory of testing hypotheses does not warrant minim...
research
07/02/2021

The Optimal Size of an Epistemic Congress

We analyze the optimal size of a congress in a representative democracy....
research
08/10/2020

Purely Bayesian counterfactuals versus Newcomb's paradox

This paper proposes a careful separation between an entity's epistemic s...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset