Enabling Reasoning with LegalRuleML

11/11/2017
by   Ho-Pun Lam (Brian), et al.
0

In order to automate verification process, regulatory rules written in natural language needs to be translated into a format that machines can understand. However, none of the existing formalisms can fully represent the elements that appear in legal norms. For instance, most of these formalisms do not provide features to capture the behavior of deontic effects, which is an important aspect in automated compliance checking. This paper presents an approach for transforming legal norms represented using LegalRuleML to a variant of Modal Defeasible Logic (and vice versa) such that legal statement represented using LegalRuleML can be transformed into a machine readable format that can be understand and reasoned about depending upon the client's preferences.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/13/2021

Compliance checking in reified IO logic via SHACL

Reified Input/Output (I/O) logic[21] has been recently proposed to model...
research
09/06/2022

From Legal Contracts to Legal Calculi: the code-driven normativity

Using dedicated software to represent or enact legislation or regulation...
research
11/01/2019

Engaging in Dialogue about an Agent's Norms and Behaviors

We present a set of capabilities allowing an agent planning with moral a...
research
09/08/2022

Bounded Satisfiability Checking of Metric First-order Temporal Logic

Legal properties involve reasoning about data values and time. Metric fi...
research
01/12/2022

DPCL: a Language Template for Normative Specifications

Several solutions for specifying normative artefacts (norms, contracts, ...
research
05/08/2022

Transparency, Compliance, And Contestability When Code Is Law

Both technical security mechanisms and legal processes serve as mechanis...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset