Empirical strategy-proofness

07/29/2019
by   Rodrigo A. Velez, et al.
0

We study the plausibility of sub-optimal Nash equilibria of the direct revelation mechanism associated with a strategy-proof social choice function. By using the recently introduced empirical equilibrium analysis (Velez and Brown, 2019, arXiv:1804.07986) we determine that this behavior is plausible only when the social choice function violates a non-bossiness condition and information is not interior. Analysis of the accumulated experimental and empirical evidence on these games supports our findings.

READ FULL TEXT
research
11/16/2020

The revelation principle fails when the format of each agent's strategy is an action

In mechanism design theory, a designer would like to implement a social ...
research
03/19/2022

Incentive Compatibility in Two-Stage Repeated Stochastic Games

We address the problem of mechanism design for two-stage repeated stocha...
research
05/28/2019

Computational Aspects of Equilibria in Discrete Preference Games

We study the complexity of equilibrium computation in discrete preferenc...
research
03/13/2023

Strategy-proof Budgeting via a VCG-like Mechanism

We present a strategy-proof public goods budgeting mechanism where agent...
research
10/25/2019

On positionality of trigger strategies Nash Equilibria in SCAR

We study the positionality of trigger strategies Nash equilibria σ for t...
research
11/16/2019

Inference in Models of Discrete Choice with Social Interactions Using Network Data

This paper studies inference in models of discrete choice with social in...
research
11/16/2021

Incentives Against Power Grabs or How to Engineer the Revolution in a Pooled Proof of Stake System

Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain systems, especially those that allow sta...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset