-
Software Engineering Standards for Epidemiological Modeling
There are many normative and technical questions involved in evaluating ...
09/19/2020 ∙ by Jack K. Horner, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Peer Review: Objectivity, Anonymity, Trust
This dissertation is focused on the role of objectivity in peer review. ...
05/10/2020 ∙ by Daniel Ucko, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Consensus in Software Engineering: A Cognitive Mapping Study
Background: Philosophers of science including Collins, Feyerabend, Kuhn ...
02/18/2018 ∙ by Pontus Johnson, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Understanding Peer Review of Software Engineering Papers
Peer review is a key activity intended to preserve the quality and integ...
09/02/2020 ∙ by Neil A. Ernst, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
On the Naming of Methods: A Survey of Professional Developers
This paper describes the results of a large (+1100 responses) survey of ...
02/26/2021 ∙ by Reem S. AlSuhaibani, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Using Camouflaged Cyber Simulations as a Model to Ensure Validity in Cybersecurity Experimentation
Experimental research methods describe standards to safeguard scientific...
05/16/2019 ∙ by Carrie Gardner, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
-
Design Dimensions for Software Certification: A Grounded Analysis
In many domains, software systems cannot be deployed until authorities j...
05/23/2019 ∙ by Gabriel Ferreira, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
read it
Empirical Standards for Software Engineering Research
10/07/2020 ∙ by Paul Ralph, et al. ∙
0
∙
share
Empirical Standards are natural-language models of a scientific community's expectations for a specific kind of study (e.g. a questionnaire survey). The ACM SIGSOFT Paper and Peer Review Quality Initiative generated empirical standards for research methods commonly used in software engineering. These living documents, which should be continuously revised to reflect evolving consensus around research best practices, will improve research quality and make peer review more effective, reliable, transparent and fair.
READ FULL TEXT
Comments
There are no comments yet.