Embedding Default Logic in Propositional Argumentation Systems

07/16/2002
by   Dritan Berzati, et al.
0

In this paper we present a transformation of finite propositional default theories into so-called propositional argumentation systems. This transformation allows to characterize all notions of Reiter's default logic in the framework of argumentation systems. As a consequence, computing extensions, or determining wether a given formula belongs to one extension or all extensions can be answered without leaving the field of classical propositional logic. The transformation proposed is linear in the number of defaults.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
04/29/2014

Analysis of Dialogical Argumentation via Finite State Machines

Dialogical argumentation is an important cognitive activity by which age...
research
03/07/2000

Description of GADEL

This article describes the first implementation of the GADEL system : a ...
research
07/17/2002

On the existence and multiplicity of extensions in dialectical argumentation

In the present paper, the existence and multiplicity problems of extensi...
research
09/13/2018

Relevance in Structured Argumentation

We study properties related to relevance in non-monotonic consequence re...
research
01/16/2014

Grounding FO and FO(ID) with Bounds

Grounding is the task of reducing a first-order theory and finite domain...
research
06/28/2017

Default Logic and Bounded Treewidth

In this paper, we study Reiter's propositional default logic when the tr...
research
09/09/2011

Reasoning about Action: An Argumentation - Theoretic Approach

We present a uniform non-monotonic solution to the problems of reasoning...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset