Do top conferences contain well cited papers or junk?

11/20/2019
by   James Davis, et al.
0

In order to answer questions about top conference publication patterns, citation data is collected and analyzed for several computer science conferences, with focus on computer vision and graphics. Both top and second tier conferences are included, and sampling occurred for two different 5 year periods. Example questions include: Do top conferences contain well cited papers or junk? (Yes) Are top conferences similarly cited? (No) Are second tier conferences as good as first tier conferences? (Sometimes) Has something been changing at CVPR? (Yes)

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

page 5

page 6

research
11/02/2018

Direct Citations between Citing Publications

This paper defines and explores the direct citations between citing publ...
research
07/20/2017

cvpaper.challenge in 2016: Futuristic Computer Vision through 1,600 Papers Survey

The paper gives futuristic challenges disscussed in the cvpaper.challeng...
research
09/26/2017

Integration of Japanese Papers Into the DBLP Data Set

If someone is looking for a certain publication in the field of computer...
research
03/19/2019

ReviewerNet: Visualizing Citation and Authorship Relations for Finding Reviewers

We propose ReviewerNet, an online, interactive visualization system aime...
research
09/22/2022

Attention is All They Need: Exploring the Media Archaeology of the Computer Vision Research Paper

The success of deep learning has led to the rapid transformation and gro...
research
06/09/2021

Scientometric engineering: Exploring citation dynamics via arXiv eprints

Scholarly communications have been rapidly integrated into digitised and...
research
02/13/2018

Ranking State-of-the-art Papers via Incomplete Tournaments Induced by Citations from Performance Tables

How can we find state-of-the-art papers for a given task? Is it possible...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset