Disambiguatory Signals are Stronger in Word-initial Positions

by   Tiago Pimentel, et al.

Psycholinguistic studies of human word processing and lexical access provide ample evidence of the preferred nature of word-initial versus word-final segments, e.g., in terms of attention paid by listeners (greater) or the likelihood of reduction by speakers (lower). This has led to the conjecture – as in Wedel et al. (2019b), but common elsewhere – that languages have evolved to provide more information earlier in words than later. Information-theoretic methods to establish such tendencies in lexicons have suffered from several methodological shortcomings that leave open the question of whether this high word-initial informativeness is actually a property of the lexicon or simply an artefact of the incremental nature of recognition. In this paper, we point out the confounds in existing methods for comparing the informativeness of segments early in the word versus later in the word, and present several new measures that avoid these confounds. When controlling for these confounds, we still find evidence across hundreds of languages that indeed there is a cross-linguistic tendency to front-load information in words.


Finding Concept-specific Biases in Form–Meaning Associations

This work presents an information-theoretic operationalisation of cross-...

A phonetic model of non-native spoken word processing

Non-native speakers show difficulties with spoken word processing. Many ...

The word entropy of natural languages

The average uncertainty associated with words is an information-theoreti...

Phonotactic Complexity and its Trade-offs

We present methods for calculating a measure of phonotactic complexity—b...

Exploring BERT's Sensitivity to Lexical Cues using Tests from Semantic Priming

Models trained to estimate word probabilities in context have become ubi...

Inducing Affective Lexical Semantics in Historical Language

The emotional connotation attached to words undergoes language change. I...