Designing for Contestation: Insights from Administrative Law

02/08/2021
by   Henrietta Lyons, et al.
0

A paper presented at the Workshop on Contestability in Algorithmic Systems at CSCW 2019. Challenging algorithmic decisions is important to decision subjects, yet numerous factors can limit a person's ability to contest such decisions. We propose that administrative law systems, which were created to ensure that governments are kept accountable for their actions and decision making in relation to individuals, can provide guidance on how to design contestation systems for algorithmic decision-making.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/23/2021

Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic Decisions

As the use of algorithmic systems in high-stakes decision-making increas...
research
01/31/2018

'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions

Data-driven decision-making consequential to individuals raises importan...
research
11/20/2022

Algorithmic Decision-Making Safeguarded by Human Knowledge

Commercial AI solutions provide analysts and managers with data-driven b...
research
12/21/2021

On the Adversarial Robustness of Causal Algorithmic Recourse

Algorithmic recourse seeks to provide actionable recommendations for ind...
research
12/01/2020

"A cold, technical decision-maker": Can AI provide explainability, negotiability, and humanity?

Algorithmic systems are increasingly deployed to make decisions in many ...
research
01/14/2021

Algorithmic Monoculture and Social Welfare

As algorithms are increasingly applied to screen applicants for high-sta...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset