Deepcode and Modulo-SK are Designed for Different Settings

08/18/2020
by   Hyeji Kim, et al.
17

We respond to [1] which claimed that "Modulo-SK scheme outperforms Deepcode [2]". We demonstrate that this statement is not true: the two schemes are designed and evaluated for entirely different settings. DeepCode is designed and evaluated for the AWGN channel with (potentially delayed) uncoded output feedback. Modulo-SK is evaluated on the AWGN channel with coded feedback and unit delay. [1] also claimed an implementation of Schalkwijk and Kailath (SK) [3] which was numerically stable for any number of information bits and iterations. However, we observe that while their implementation does marginally improve over ours, it also suffers from a fundamental issue with precision. Finally, we show that Deepcode dominates the optimized performance of SK, over a natural choice of parameterizations when the feedback is noisy.

READ FULL TEXT

Authors

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

11/25/2019

DeepJSCC-f: Deep Joint-Source Channel Coding of Images with Feedback

We consider wireless transmission of images in the presence of channel o...
09/19/2018

Approximate Nash Region of the Gaussian Interference Channel with Noisy Output Feedback

In this paper, an achievable η-Nash equilibrium (η-NE) region for the tw...
03/17/2021

Gaussian Channels with Feedback: A Dynamic Programming Approach

In this paper, we consider a communication system where a sender sends m...
09/30/2016

Training a Feedback Loop for Hand Pose Estimation

We propose an entirely data-driven approach to estimating the 3D pose of...
01/05/2018

High Throughput Low Delay Wireless Multicast via Multi-Channel Moving Window Codes

A fundamental challenge in wireless multicast has been how to simultaneo...
07/14/2020

Allpass Feedback Delay Networks

In the 1960s, Schroeder and Logan introduced delay-based allpass filters...
This week in AI

Get the week's most popular data science and artificial intelligence research sent straight to your inbox every Saturday.