Declarative Representation of Revision Strategies

03/08/2000
by   Gerhard Brewka, et al.
0

In this paper we introduce a nonmonotonic framework for belief revision in which reasoning about the reliability of different pieces of information based on meta-knowledge about the information is possible, and where revision strategies can be described declaratively. The approach is based on a Poole-style system for default reasoning in which entrenchment information is represented in the logical language. A notion of inference based on the least fixed point of a monotone operator is used to make sure that all theories possess a consistent set of conclusions.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
03/24/2021

Truth and Subjunctive Theories of Knowledge: No Luck?

The paper explores applications of Kripke's theory of truth to semantics...
research
01/28/1999

Representation Theory for Default Logic

Default logic can be regarded as a mechanism to represent families of be...
research
03/27/2013

Nonmonotonic Reasoning via Possibility Theory

We introduce the operation of possibility qualification and show how. th...
research
11/12/2022

Formalizing the presumption of independence

Mathematical proof aims to deliver confident conclusions, but a very sim...
research
02/22/2019

On Nominal Syntax and Permutation Fixed Points

We propose a new axiomatisation of the alpha-equivalence relation for no...
research
07/09/2002

Intuitions and the modelling of defeasible reasoning: some case studies

The purpose of this paper is to address some criticisms recently raised ...
research
02/27/2013

Syntax-based Default Reasoning as Probabilistic Model-based Diagnosis

We view the syntax-based approaches to default reasoning as a model-base...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset