Decision structure of risky choice

01/30/2017
by   Lamb Wubin, et al.
0

As we know, there is a controversy about the decision making under risk between economists and psychologists. We discuss to build a unified theory of risky choice, which would explain both of compensatory and non-compensatory theories. For risky choice, according to cognition ability, we argue that people could not build a continuous and accurate subjective probability world, but several order concepts, such as small, middle and large probability. People make decisions based on information, experience, imagination and other things. All of these things are so huge that people have to prepare some strategies. That is, people have different strategies when facing to different situations. The distributions of these things have different decision structures. More precisely, decision making is a process of simplifying the decision structure. However, the process of decision structure simplifying is not stuck in a rut, but through different path when facing problems repeatedly. It is why preference reversal always happens when making decisions. The most efficient way to simplify the decision structure is calculating expected value or making decisions based on one or two dimensions. We also argue that the deliberation time at least has four parts, which are consist of substitution time, first order time, second order time and calculation time. Decision structure also can simply explain the phenomenon of paradoxes and anomalies. JEL Codes: C10, D03, D81

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
02/13/2013

Arguing for Decisions: A Qualitative Model of Decision Making

We develop a qualitative model of decision making with two aims: to desc...
research
01/27/2023

Personalised Decision-Making without Counterfactuals

This article is a response to recent proposals by Pearl and others for a...
research
02/23/2021

Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic Decisions

As the use of algorithmic systems in high-stakes decision-making increas...
research
02/12/2020

Archimedean Choice Functions: an Axiomatic Foundation for Imprecise Decision Making

If uncertainty is modelled by a probability measure, decisions are typic...
research
09/10/2012

How is non-knowledge represented in economic theory?

In this article, we address the question of how non-knowledge about futu...
research
05/27/2015

Pignistic Probability Transforms for Mixes of Low- and High-Probability Events

In some real world information fusion situations, time critical decision...
research
11/12/2021

Catastrophe, Compounding Consistency in Choice

Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) precisely characterizes the influence t...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset