Deciding with Judgment

03/16/2019
by   Simone Manganelli, et al.
0

A decision maker starts from a judgmental decision and moves to the closest boundary of the confidence interval. This statistical decision rule is admissible and does not perform worse than the judgmental decision with a probability equal to the confidence level, which is interpreted as a coefficient of statistical risk aversion. The confidence level is related to the decision maker's aversion to uncertainty and can be elicited with laboratory experiments using urns a la Ellsberg. The decision rule is applied to a problem of asset allocation for an investor whose judgmental decision is to keep all her wealth in cash.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
10/09/2019

A New Confidence Interval for Odds Ratio

We consider the problem of interval estimation of the odds ratio. An asy...
research
11/26/2019

On Optimal Solutions to Compound Statistical Decision Problems

In a compound decision problem, consisting of n statistically independen...
research
04/10/2021

Exact-corrected confidence interval for risk difference in noninferiority binomial trials

A novel confidence interval estimator is proposed for the risk differenc...
research
05/31/2023

Human-Aligned Calibration for AI-Assisted Decision Making

Whenever a binary classifier is used to provide decision support, it typ...
research
10/24/2022

Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma

We study the classical discursive dilemma from the point of view of find...
research
08/20/2022

Rationalizing Pre-Analysis Plans: Statistical Decisions Subject to Implementability

Pre-analysis plans (PAPs) are a potential remedy to the publication of s...
research
07/06/2023

When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice?

Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adapt...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset