Dealing with Qualitative and Quantitative Features in Legal Domains

03/05/2019
by   Maximiliano C. D. Budán, et al.
0

In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a formal characterization of features related to the knowledge, in order to capture proper reasoning in legal domains. We add meta-data information to the arguments in the form of labels representing quantitative and qualitative data about them. These labels are propagated through an argumentative graph according to the relations of support, conflict, and aggregation between arguments.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
12/12/2012

Formalizing Scenario Analysis

We propose a formal treatment of scenarios in the context of a dialectic...
research
01/16/2013

Risk Agoras: Dialectical Argumentation for Scientific Reasoning

We propose a formal framework for intelligent systems which can reason a...
research
09/07/2022

Legal Detection of AI Products Based on Formal Argumentation and Legal Ontology

Ontology is a popular method for knowledge representation in different d...
research
09/20/2022

On resolving conflicts between arguments

Argument systems are based on the idea that one can construct arguments ...
research
07/01/2020

Context Graphs for Legal Reasoning and Argumentation

We propose a new, structured, logic-based framework for legal reasoning ...
research
06/28/2009

General combination rules for qualitative and quantitative beliefs

Martin and Osswald Martin07 have recently proposed many generalizations ...
research
09/22/2020

Burden of Persuasion in Argumentation

This paper provides a formal model for the burden of persuasion in dialo...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset