CSAT is not in P

11/02/2021
by   Fabio Romano, et al.
0

In this paper we have to demonstrate that if we claim to have an algorithm that solves CSAT in polynomial time with a DTM (Deterministic Turing Machine), then we have to admit that: there is a counterexample that invalidates the correctness of the algorithm. This is because if we suppose that it can prove that an elenkhos formula (a formula that lists the negated codes of all models) is a contradiction, and if we change exactly a specific boolean variable of that formula, then we have proven that: in this case the algorithm will always fail.

READ FULL TEXT
research
04/06/2018

Complexity of the CNF-satisfiability problem

This paper is devoted to the complexity of the Boolean satisfiability pr...
research
07/18/2018

Quantified boolean formula problem

This paper is devoted to the complexity of the quantified boolean formul...
research
12/20/2019

Axiomatizing rectangular grids with no extra non-unary relations

We construct a formula ϕ which axiomatizes non-narrow rectangular grids ...
research
05/18/2022

Kac-Rice formula: A contemporary overview of the main results and applications

The book develops the fundamental ideas of the famous Kac-Rice formula f...
research
11/02/2022

BAXMC: a CEGAR approach to Max#SAT

Max#SAT is an important problem with multiple applications in security a...
research
08/05/2021

The Key Equation for One-Point Codes

For Reed-Solomon codes, the key equation relates the syndrome polynomial...
research
05/16/2023

Can we forget how we learned? Representing states in iterated belief revision

The three most common representations of states in iterated belief revis...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset