Critique of Boyu Sima's Proof that P≠ NP

05/07/2020
by   Brendon Pon, et al.
0

We review and critique Boyu Sima's paper, "A solution of the P versus NP problem based on specific property of clique function," (arXiv:1911.00722) which claims to prove that P≠ NP by way of removing the gap between the nonmonotone circuit complexity and the monotone circuit complexity of the clique function. We first describe Sima's argument, and then we describe where and why it fails. Finally, we present a simple example that clearly demonstrates the failure.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
11/02/2019

A Solution of the P versus NP Problem based on specific property of clique function

Circuit lower bounds are important since it is believed that a super-pol...
research
03/28/2021

On Arroyo-Figueroa's Proof that P≠NP

We critique Javier Arroyo-Figueroa's paper titled “The existence of the ...
research
08/11/2017

A Solution of the P versus NP Problem

Berg and Ulfberg and Amano and Maruoka have used CNF-DNF-approximators t...
research
05/02/2020

On P Versus NP

I generalize a well-known result that P = NP fails for monotone polynomi...
research
04/14/2021

On Lev Gordeev's "On P Versus NP"

In the paper "On P versus NP," Lev Gordeev attempts to extend the method...
research
05/02/2022

A Critique of Uribe's "P vs. NP"

In this critique, we examine the technical report by Daniel Uribe entitl...
research
02/19/2015

NP-Hardness and Inapproximability of Sparse PCA

We give a reduction from clique to establish that sparse PCA is NP-hard...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset