Covert Communications Versus Physical Layer Security

03/18/2018
by   Moslem Forouzesh, et al.
0

This letter studies and compares the physical-layer security approach and the covert communication approach for a wiretap channel with a transmitter, an intended receiver and an eavesdropper. In order to make the comparison, we investigate the power allocation problems for maximizing the secrecy/covert rate subject to the transmit power constraint. Simulation results illustrate that if the eavesdropper is not noisy or it is near to the transmitter, covert communication is more preferable.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
07/01/2021

Optimal Power Allocation for Rate Splitting Communications with Deep Reinforcement Learning

This letter introduces a novel framework to optimize the power allocatio...
research
11/15/2018

Physical-Layer Security: Does it Work in a Real Environment?

This paper applies channel sounding measurements to enable physical-laye...
research
08/15/2018

Physical Layer Security Enhancement for Satellite Communication among Similar Channels: Relay Selection and Power Allocation

Channels of satellite communication are usually modeled as Rician fading...
research
08/02/2022

Optimal Friendly Jamming and Transmit Power Allocation in RIS-assisted Secure Communication

This paper analyzes the secrecy performance of a reconfigurable intellig...
research
07/07/2020

Demo: iJam with Channel Randomization

Physical-layer key generation methods utilize the variations of the comm...
research
03/24/2016

A universal tradeoff between power, precision and speed in physical communication

Maximizing the speed and precision of communication while minimizing pow...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset