Correcting for attenuation due to measurement error

11/02/2019
by   Jonas Moss, et al.
0

I present a frequentist method for quantifying uncertainty when correcting correlations for attenuation due to measurement error. The method is conservative but has far better coverage properties than the methods currently used when sample sizes are small. I recommend the use of confidence curves in favor of confidence intervals when this method is used. I introduce the R package "attenuation" which can be used to calculate and visualize the methods described in this paper.

READ FULL TEXT

page 1

page 2

page 3

page 4

research
05/16/2018

Valid and Approximately Valid Confidence Intervals for Current Status Data

We introduce a new framework for creating point-wise confidence interval...
research
08/31/2023

Optimal confidence interval for the difference of proportions

Estimating the probability of the binomial distribution is a basic probl...
research
04/14/2020

Measurement Error in Nutritional Epidemiology: A Survey

This article reviews bias-correction models for measurement error of exp...
research
08/24/2018

Applications of the Fractional-Random-Weight Bootstrap

The bootstrap, based on resampling, has, for several decades, been a wid...
research
04/09/2021

Conditional Inference: Towards a Hierarchy of Statistical Evidence

Statistical uncertainty has many sources. P-values and confidence interv...
research
12/11/2018

Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for Ranks With Application to Ranking Institutions

When a ranking of institutions such as medical centers or universities i...

Please sign up or login with your details

Forgot password? Click here to reset